skip to main content

HBV Vaccination Response — SCE Infectious Diseases MCQ

Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.

HardTravel Medicine & VaccinationHBV Vaccination ResponseSCE Infectious Diseases

An adult with HIV completes hepatitis-B vaccination and has anti-HBs 45 mIU/mL. Which interpretation best supports ongoing care?

Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.

Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct answer: CThis is seroprotective but less robust than a titre at or above 100 mIU/mL, so follow the HIV-specific booster and monitoring pathway after susceptibility review with review

The best answer is “This is seroprotective but less robust than a titre at or above 100 mIU/mL, so follow the HIV-specific booster and monitoring pathway after susceptibility review with review”. Anti-HBs at or above 10 mIU/mL is protective, but people with HIV may lose antibody more quickly and a 10–99 response warrants HIV-guideline follow-up. “The vaccine has failed because titres above 1000 mIU/mL are needed” is less appropriate because it does not satisfy the scenario's decisive clinical or jurisdictional requirement. “The titre suggests occult hepatitis-B infection requiring tenofovir treatment” is less appropriate because it does not satisfy the scenario's decisive clinical or jurisdictional requirement. “Post-vaccination serology has little value in people with HIV” is less appropriate because it does not satisfy the scenario's decisive clinical or jurisdictional requirement. “Hepatitis-B immunoglobulin is required in the absence of exposure” is less appropriate because it does not satisfy the scenario's decisive clinical or jurisdictional requirement.

Reference: BHIVA vaccination guidelines: https://bhiva.org/clinical-guideline/vaccination-guidelines/