skip to main content

Home INR Self-monitoring — EECC MCQ

Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.

ModerateValvular Heart DiseaseHome INR Self-monitoringEECC

A 60-year-old man with mechanical AVR (INR target 2.5-3.5) and stable INR management asks about self-monitoring of INR at home. What does the evidence show?

Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.

Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct answer: APatient self-monitoring (PSM) or self-management (PSA) of warfarin INR at home improves time in therapeutic range and reduces thromboembolic events compared with clinic-based monitoring — it is recommended (Class IIa) for motivated patients after appropriate training

Home INR monitoring using point-of-care coagulometers allows: (1) patient self-monitoring (PSM) — patient measures INR and reports to clinic for dose adjustment; or (2) patient self-management (PSA) — patient measures AND adjusts warfarin dose based on a trained algorithm. Meta-analyses (including the PROACT study) show that home INR monitoring: improves time in therapeutic range (TTR), reduces major thromboembolic events (by ~50%), and may reduce mortality compared with clinic-based monitoring. The 2025 ESC VHD Guidelines recommend PSM or PSA for patients on warfarin for mechanical valves (Class IIa), provided adequate training, cognitive ability, and manual dexterity are present. Devices require regular quality control. This approach empowers patients and is particularly valuable for those in rural areas or with limited clinic access.

Reference: ESC/EACTS (2025): VHD Guidelines; PROACT Study