skip to main content

CIED Advisory Management — EECC MCQ

Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.

ModerateCardiac DevicesCIED Advisory ManagementEECC

A 70-year-old man with an ICD is told his device has been subject to a manufacturer advisory (recall) due to a potential battery depletion issue. He is asymptomatic with no device malfunction detected on interrogation. What is the recommended approach?

Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.

Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct answer: E — Follow the manufacturer's specific advisory recommendations, which typically include intensified remote monitoring and/or shortened in-clinic follow-up intervals, rather than routine prophylactic device replacement

CIED advisories (previously called 'recalls') are issued by manufacturers when a potential defect is identified. The ESC and BHRS recommend a measured approach: (1) follow the specific manufacturer advisory (which details the failure mode, affected models/serials, and recommended actions); (2) increase monitoring frequency (more frequent remote transmissions, shorter in-clinic follow-up); (3) prophylactic device replacement is generally NOT recommended unless: the advisory identifies a life-threatening failure mode, the individual patient's device shows specific warning signs, or the patient's clinical circumstance makes failure particularly dangerous. Prophylactic generator replacement carries its own procedural risks (infection, lead damage) that must be weighed against the statistical risk of device malfunction. The MADIT-RIT experience with Sprint Fidelis lead advisory demonstrated that indiscriminate lead extraction/replacement caused more harm than careful monitoring.

Reference: BHRS CIED Advisory Guidance; HRS Expert Consensus