Constriction with Normal Pericardial Thickness — EECC MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: D — Yes — up to 20% of surgically confirmed constrictive pericarditis has normal pericardial thickness on imaging; constriction can result from visceral pericardial fibrosis or microscopic fibrotic change not detectable on standard imaging
The 2025 ESC Myocarditis/Pericarditis Guidelines emphasise that normal pericardial thickness does NOT exclude constrictive pericarditis. Approximately 18-20% of surgically confirmed cases have pericardial thickness ≤2 mm on CT/CMR. This occurs because: (1) constriction can result from visceral pericardial fibrosis (the visceral layer is too thin to measure on standard imaging); (2) microscopic collagen deposition can cause functional constriction without macroscopic thickening; (3) pericardial calcification (even without thickening) can cause rigid constriction. Diagnosis relies on the constellation of: clinical features (elevated JVP with prominent y descent, Kussmaul sign, pericardial knock), echocardiographic features (septal bounce, respirophasic variation), CMR (pericardial LGE, real-time cine), and haemodynamic assessment (simultaneous RV/LV pressures showing equalisation and discordance).
Reference: ESC (2025): Myocarditis/Pericarditis Guidelines