CABG Graft Disease — EECC MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: E — PCI to the native RCA vessel if feasible, rather than intervention on the diseased SVG
Late SVG disease (>5 years post-CABG) is characterised by diffuse atherosclerosis, friable plaque, and high embolic risk during intervention. Current practice favours PCI to the native coronary vessel when technically feasible, as this avoids the embolic complications of SVG intervention and provides better long-term outcomes. If native vessel PCI is not feasible, SVG PCI with a DES and embolic protection device (EPD) should be used. The LIMA-LAD graft has excellent long-term patency (>90% at 15 years) and is rarely diseased. Redo CABG carries significantly higher operative risk than primary CABG.
Reference: ESC (2024): Guidelines for the Management of Chronic Coronary Syndromes