skip to main content

Trial Participation in Deteriorating Patient — SCE Palliative Medicine MCQ

Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.

ModerateCommunication & EthicsTrial Participation in Deteriorating PatientSCE Palliative Medicine

A 60-year-old man with advanced cancer is enrolled in a phase III clinical trial. He has deteriorated significantly such that his Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) is now 30%. He continues to receive the trial medication but is experiencing significant side effects. What should the palliative care team discuss with the oncology team?

Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.

Reveal the answer and explanation

Correct answer: AWhether continued trial participation remains in the patient’s best interests—deteriorating performance status and significant side effects suggest the trial medication may now be causing more harm than benefit

Explanation lettering: E = shown as A · A = shown as C · C = shown as D · D = shown as E

The correct answer is E. In the context of advanced cancer with PPS 30%, both poor performance status and significant treatment toxicity raise concern about shifting the benefit–harm balance. UK cancer care planning recognises that a patient being “unfit” on functional grounds typically triggers reassessment of active treatments in MDT discussions ([digital.nhs.uk](https://digital.nhs.uk/ndrs/data/data-sets/cosd/cosd-user-guide-v10/core---cancer-care-plan?utm_source=openai)); and NICE emphasises that people approaching end of life should be offered advance care planning, including reconsidering ongoing interventions in light of changing priorities ([nice.org.uk](https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs13/chapter/Quality-statement-2-Advance-care-planning?utm_source=openai)). Option E correctly reflects the need for collaborative discussion between palliative care and oncology on whether trial continuation still aligns with the patient’s best interests. Option A is paternalistic and unilateral; B is incorrect as investigator/sponsor and clinicians share patient‑welfare responsibility; C undermines multidisciplinary joint working; and D ignores shifting clinical context and ethical duty to avoid non‑beneficial interventions.

Reference: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/conditions-and-diseases/cancer/palliative-care