Heart Failure (HFrEF) — EECC MCQ
Instant feedback + full explanation. One question, done properly.
Educational content. Not a substitute for clinical judgement or local policy.
Reveal the answer and explanation
Correct answer: D — Individual ICD assessment using the aneurysm and scar burden
Risk calculators inform but do not replace individual assessment. An LV apical aneurysm, extensive late gadolinium enhancement and clinically significant ventricular arrhythmia can materially modify risk even when the numerical estimate is below a conventional threshold. Shared ICD decision-making should incorporate competing mortality, device complications and the complete phenotype. Apply this conclusion only to the clinical circumstances stated, with appropriate specialist review, contraindication checks, shared decision-making and follow-up. Reassess if the physiology, treatment response or competing risk changes. The competing options would require a different haemodynamic profile, diagnosis, procedural indication or risk balance from the one described here.
Reference: 2023 ESC Guidelines for cardiomyopathies. https://www.escardio.org/guidelines/clinical-practice-guidelines/all-esc-practice-guidelines/cardiomyopathy/