BMJ Learning vs FourteenFish (2025): The Course vs The Portfolio
At a Glance
Who is it for?
BMJ Learning:Clinicians
FourteenFish:GPs
Why choose BMJ Learning?
- **Depth**: Deep clinical dives into specific conditions.
- **Brand**: Trusted BMJ editorial standards.
- **Text/Audio**: Good mix of formats.
Why choose FourteenFish?
- **Integration**: Watch a video and it automatically logs into your appraisal.
- **Punctuated**: Short 'Education Library' updates (5 mins).
- **Exam Prep**: Specific AKT/RCA packages.
Feature Comparison
| Capability | BMJ Learning | FourteenFish |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Clinical Topics | Appraisal & Exams |
| Integration | Manual Upload | Seamless |
In-Depth Analysis
Overview
If you use FourteenFish for your appraisal, their own Education Library is incredibly convenient because it updates your portfolio automatically. However, BMJ Learning remains the gold standard for detailed clinical modules.
Looking for a faster way?
While BMJ Learning and FourteenFish are powerful tools, iatroX offers a free, AI-driven alternative focused specifically on rapid UK guideline retrieval and exam prep.
Use-Cases
Deep dive into Diabetes
When to choose BMJ Learning
- **Winner.** Comprehensive modules.
When to choose FourteenFish
- Lighter overview.
Recording CPD effortlessly
When to choose BMJ Learning
- Requires export.
When to choose FourteenFish
- **Winner.** Auto-logs to portfolio.