Two different philosophies. SCA Revision gives you cases to study — 350+ expert-written scenarios with mark-scheme breakdowns, 70+ consultation videos with examiner-perspective marking, and AI simulated patients. You learn what SCA cases look like and how they are marked. £11.99/month standard, £15.99/month premium.
Clinitalk gives you feedback on your own consultations — you record a real patient encounter or role-play, and the AI analyses your performance against SCA marking criteria. You learn how you actually consult and what to change. Subscription + course model, created by RCGP examiners.
When to Use Each
SCA Revision is better for early preparation — building your case repertoire, understanding the marking criteria, and watching how model consultations are scored. If you have never seen an SCA case before, start here. The 350+ written cases and 70+ consultation videos build the pattern recognition that underpins SCA performance.
Clinitalk is better for late preparation — refining your technique once you know the cases and understand the marking framework. After 3 months of case-based study, Clinitalk shows you whether your actual consulting behaviour matches what you have learned. It is the mirror that shows the gap between theory and practice.
SCA Revision now has AI patients too (via SCARevision.ai) — blurring the line between the platforms. But SCA Revision's core strength remains the written case bank and consultation videos. Clinitalk's core strength remains real-consultation feedback.
Study Budget
Both are potentially claimable under GP0001 SCA preparation funding (up to £600 across training). Check with your TPD for local approval.
Where iatroX Fits
SCA Revision gives you cases. Clinitalk gives you feedback. iatroX gives you the clinical knowledge that makes both more effective — adaptive AKT revision ensures you recognise the conditions before you practise consulting about them. Free to add alongside either tool.