Spaced repetition is not magic; it is scheduling. Most people fail at it because they copy someone else’s intervals without reference to their exam date and workload. The research is consistent: spacing improves long-term retention, and the optimal spacing depends on how long you need to retain the material.
What the evidence says (in plain terms)
Meta-analyses and large studies on spacing show reliable benefits over massed practice, and suggest that inter-study intervals (the ‘lag’) interact with the final retention interval. Translation: the closer you are to the exam, the shorter your lag; further out, you can widen it.
1
Step 1 — Define your retention interval
How long do you need to retain this content before being tested? If your exam is in 6 weeks, your retention interval is 6 weeks — not ‘forever’.
2
Step 2 — Use a simple lag ladder
For most candidates: Day 0 learn/attempt → Day 2 revisit → Day 7 revisit → Day 14 revisit → Day 28 revisit → final mixed Q-bank sessions. Adjust to your rota rather than forcing perfection.
3
Step 3 — Keep sessions short and retrieval-based
Each revisit should be retrieval first (attempt from memory), then minimal correction. Long “review sessions” are usually a disguised form of re-reading.
4
Step 4 — Promote weak items
If you miss it, it moves down the ladder (shorter lag). If you get it right quickly, it can move up (longer lag). The schedule adapts to your actual performance.
5
Step 5 — Close with mixed retrieval, not cramming
In the final 7–10 days, shift towards mixed blocks and near-neighbour sets. Your exam will be mixed; your final phase should be too.
SourceCepeda et al. (2006): Meta-analysis of distributed practice / spacing effect (PubMed)
Open Link SourceCepeda et al. (2008): Spacing effects over longer durations (PubMed)
Open Link SourceVlach (2012): Overview of spacing effect (open access, PMC)
Open Link