If your revision feels productive but your scores do not move, you are probably stuck in the “recognition trap”: re-reading and highlighting make the material feel familiar, but familiarity is not recall. High-stakes exams reward what you can retrieve under pressure, not what looks familiar on the page.
The Science (Testing Effect)
Retrieval practice (attempting to pull information from memory) strengthens long-term retention more reliably than re-studying. This has been shown in classic laboratory work (Roediger & Karpicke, 2006), meaningful learning contexts (Karpicke & Blunt, 2011), and is rated “high utility” in evidence reviews of study techniques (Dunlosky et al., 2013).
The rule: revision should feel slightly difficult. That difficulty is not a sign you are failing — it is the mechanism that builds retrieval strength. Your job is to engineer that difficulty in a controlled, repeatable workflow.
1
Step 1 — Replace “review” with “recall” (2 minutes)
Before you look at any notes, write down (or say out loud) everything you can remember about the topic: definitions, red flags, first-line management, contraindications, and common traps. This is the moment that matters.
2
Step 2 — The Blurting Method (10 minutes)
Use a blank page. Set a timer. “Blurt” the topic from memory in bullet points: diagnosis → key differentials → investigations → management. No notes. When you stall, mark a gap with a symbol (e.g., “??”) and keep moving.
3
Step 3 — Mark the gap, not the page (5 minutes)
Now open your reference. Only fix what was missing or wrong. Convert each gap into 1–3 very specific prompts (e.g., “First-line antibiotic for uncomplicated cystitis in pregnancy?”).
4
Step 4 — Closed-book Q-bank block (15–25 minutes)
Do a short set of questions strictly closed-book. The goal is not volume — it is forcing retrieval under exam-like constraints. If you must look something up, finish the question first, then check.
5
Step 5 — Immediate feedback (3 minutes)
Read the explanation with one question: “What would have made me choose the right answer next time?” Extract the decision rule (the discriminating feature, threshold, contraindication, or next step).
6
Step 6 — Schedule the next retrieval (30 seconds)
Don’t “review later” vaguely. Put the gap into a spaced system (Anki, iatroX spaced sets, or a simple calendar: tomorrow → 3 days → 7 days → 14 days).
Avoid the common failure mode
Open-book questions and “reading the rationale without committing” feel efficient, but they blunt the Testing Effect. Commit to an answer first. If you’re not willing to be wrong on purpose, you’re not doing retrieval practice.
Tactical target: make 70–80% of your revision time retrieval-based. Keep “input” (reading/watching) only for truly new content, then immediately convert it into prompts that you must retrieve later.
SourceRoediger & Karpicke (2006) — Test-enhanced learning (PubMed)
Open Link SourceKarpicke & Blunt (2011) — Retrieval practice vs concept mapping (Science)
Open Link SourceDunlosky et al. (2013) — Learning techniques utility review (SAGE)
Open Link