AI in medical education: introducing quiz iatroX, a large, free question bank for students and clinicians

AI in medical education: introducing quiz iatroX, a large, free question bank for students and clinicians

by iatroX AI

Introduction

Medical knowledge is expanding at an unprecedented rate, contributing to information overload for clinicians and learners​. Keeping up with constantly updated guidelines, research, and best practices can overwhelm even the most diligent medical student or doctor. At the same time, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a potential ally in managing this deluge of information. In medical education, AI-powered tools are beginning to act as intelligent assistants – essentially a “co-pilot” guiding and personalizing the learning experience. This article explores how iatroX – a new platform offering a large, free medical question bank – leverages AI to support medical students, international medical graduates (IMGs), and UK clinicians in their studies and practice. We will examine iatroX’s core functions, its use of retrieval augmented generation (RAG) and prompt engineering for evidence-based answers, and its role in fostering a resilient, responsive healthcare system. Throughout, we maintain a balanced, evidence-based perspective on the promises and precautions of AI in clinical education.

The iatroX Vision: Empowering Learners and a Resilient Healthcare System

Quiz iatroX was born from a vision to make high-quality medical education resources accessible to all, thereby empowering users to overcome cognitive overload and contribute to a more resilient and responsive healthcare system. In practical terms, iatroX is a free question bank platform with over 6,000 free questions tailored to UK medical curricula and examinations. Its content spans critical exams such as MRCP (Membership of the Royal College of Physicians), the GP AKT (Applied Knowledge Test), PACES (Practical Assessment of Clinical Examination Skills), the new GP SCA (Simulated Consultation Assessment) cases, and various specialty exit exams. By covering this broad spectrum, iatroX serves as a comprehensive free revision resource for both trainees and established clinicians looking to refresh their knowledge.

At the heart of iatroX’s mission is the recognition that today’s clinicians must navigate an immense volume of information while maintaining high-quality care. By providing an AI-driven question bank, iatroX aims to reduce the burden on learners who might otherwise spend countless hours sifting through guidelines and textbooks. The platform’s core functions center on self-assessment and learning reinforcement: users can practice exam-style questions, receive instant, detailed explanations, and trust that the answers are aligned with up-to-date clinical guidelines. In doing so, iatroX not only helps individual users build confidence and competence, but also supports the healthcare system at large by promoting well-informed, up-to-date practitioners. This aligns with calls for “precision medical education” – delivering the right education to the right learner at the right time – which is increasingly feasible with AI as an educational partner.

Core Features of the Quiz iatroX Platform

To appreciate iatroX’s value, it’s important to understand its key features and how they differ from traditional resources:

  • Extensive Question Bank for UK Exams: iatroX offers a vast repository of questions reflecting the style and content of prominent UK exams. Users will find dedicated question sets for MRCP Part 1/2 written exams (question bank MRCP), the MRCP PACES clinical stations (question bank PACES), the MRCGP exams including both the AKT question bank and SCA cases practice, as well as questions for specialty certificate and exit exams. This breadth ensures that medical students and trainees in different fields can all engage with relevant material. All questions are available without charge, making iatroX a Free Medical Question Bank that lowers financial barriers to exam preparation.

  • AI-Powered Explanations and References: After answering each question, users receive a detailed explanation generated with the assistance of AI. This isn’t a generic or static rationale – iatroX uses cutting-edge AI techniques to provide guideline-aligned, evidence-based clinical answers. In practice, the system retrieves relevant information from clinical guidelines (e.g. NICE guidelines, GMC advice) or authoritative textbooks and journals, and then uses a large language model to craft a coherent explanation. The answer is accompanied by references or citations to the source material, so learners can verify facts and read further​. This approach transforms question practice into an active learning session, where each explanation directs the user to evidence-based resources rather than just stating that an answer is correct or incorrect.

  • Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) for Accuracy: A core technology behind iatroX’s answer explanations is retrieval augmented generation. RAG combines a search engine with a text generator: when a question is answered, iatroX’s AI will retrieve supporting documents (for example, a relevant guideline paragraph or a review article) and then generate an answer that incorporates that information. By grounding answers in external knowledge, RAG helps ensure factual consistency and reduces the risk of AI “hallucinating” incorrect facts​. In other words, iatroX doesn’t rely on the AI’s memory alone; it actively pulls in up-to-date information so that the guidance it provides is current and trustworthy. This is especially useful in medicine, where guidelines can change and LLMs’ built-in knowledge can become outdated – RAG allows the system to access the latest information without retraining the entire model​. The result is that a medical student using iatroX can feel more confident that the explanation to a cardiology question is in line with the latest NICE heart failure guidelines, for example, and a GP trainee can trust that an answer about diabetes management reflects current standards of care.

  • Prompt Engineering for Clarity and Relevance: Another technical pillar of iatroX is careful prompt engineering. This involves designing the AI’s instructions so that its outputs are formatted usefully for the learner. The platform’s creators have fine-tuned prompts to ensure that explanations are concise, clinically relevant, and aligned with exam expectations. The AI is guided to answer with the level of detail and tone appropriate for medical learners, and to explicitly cite guidelines or studies when appropriate. Effective prompt engineering also means the AI can handle a variety of question formats – from single-best-answer multiple choice to scenario-based questions – and produce explanations that address why the correct answer is right and why the other options are wrong. This mimics the style of expert-written rationales found in traditional question banks, but with the advantage that the content can be dynamically updated as medical knowledge evolves.

  • User-Friendly Experience and Personalization: iatroX’s platform is designed with the end-user in mind. The interface allows users to target specific topics or exams (for instance, a learner can focus on a “question bank AKT” module when preparing for the GP knowledge test, or practice a set of “SCA cases” to simulate their consultation exam). Progress tracking and performance analytics help identify areas of weakness. While these features are common in many digital question banks, iatroX can potentially take them further by leveraging AI – for example, by personalizing question recommendations based on the user’s past performance, or even generating new questions on the fly for targeted practice. Such AI-driven personalization aligns with the emerging idea of AI as a tutor that adapts to each learner’s needs​. As Dr. Marc Triola noted, future medical education may see “AI as a co-pilot sitting next to the student…providing guidance and advice along the way, curating curricula and assessments”​. iatroX is an early realization of this vision, using AI to curate and deliver content that meets the learner where they are.

Harnessing RAG for Guideline-Aligned Answers

The use of RAG and prompt engineering in iatroX is more than just a technical curiosity – it directly impacts the quality of education the platform provides. By design, this AI-driven approach addresses some of the key challenges in using large language models for medical learning. One such challenge is the tendency of unrestrained models to produce confident-sounding but incorrect information (the so-called hallucinations). Because iatroX always provides sources and draws from vetted materials, it introduces a level of accountability and transparency to the AI’s answers​. In fact, a recent study on applying RAG in medical exam preparation demonstrated that combining LLM-generated explanations with verified sources can improve the credibility and logical coherence of content while minimizing cognitive overload on learners​. By integrating human-curated knowledge and having medical specialists oversee content development, systems like iatroX can mitigate risks and ensure that using AI in this context remains safe and effective.

Moreover, RAG allows iatroX’s content to stay aligned with evidence-based medicine (EBM) principles. As guidelines update or new evidence emerges, the platform can retrieve the latest information during the answer-generation process. For example, if a question is about managing hypertension and new blood pressure targets have been published, the AI can pull in those new recommendations from a guideline update, thus giving an answer that reflects the latest standard. This dynamic updating is a stark contrast to traditional question banks (like Passmedicine or Pastest), which might update their question explanations only periodically. iatroX’s approach means that learners are studying the most current information available — a critical advantage in healthcare education.

Of course, the use of AI is not infallible. iatroX’s team emphasizes verification and quality control, recognizing that AI-generated content should be reviewed to maintain accuracy. The platform reportedly leverages human-in-the-loop oversight for its question explanations, especially for high-stakes or contentious topics. This hybrid model (AI + expert review) combines efficiency with reliability. It’s an approach echoed in the broader medical education community: experts suggest that while generative AI can greatly assist in creating learning content and even entire question banks, educators must “always double-check the AI’s responses to maintain accuracy and prevent the spread of misinformation”​. iatroX’s use of references and transparency helps users themselves participate in this verification process, turning each question into an opportunity not just to test knowledge but to learn the evidence behind the knowledge.

Benefits to Medical Students, IMGs, and Clinicians

A platform like iatroX offers distinct benefits to different groups in the medical community:

For Medical Students: Undergraduate medical students can use iatroX as a supplement to their studies and a tool for exam preparation. For instance, final-year students preparing for their comprehensive exams or the Prescribing Safety Assessment can find relevant practice questions. The free revision aspect is particularly important for students, who often juggle financial constraints. Instead of paying for multiple resources or expensive question banks, they have at their fingertips a question bank comparable in size to commercial options (with thousands of questions) at no cost. The AI-generated explanations, complete with references, also encourage a deeper understanding. Rather than rote memorization of facts, students using iatroX can quickly consult the cited guideline or textbook excerpt to understand why an answer is correct. This habit of seeking evidence can strengthen their clinical reasoning and evidence-based medicine skills early in their career.

For International Medical Graduates (IMGs): IMGs entering the UK system face the dual challenge of mastering exam content and acclimatizing to UK-specific guidelines and practices. iatroX can serve as a guided orientation to UK clinical knowledge. Through practicing questions in areas like ethics, clinical guidelines (e.g., NICE guidelines on screening, immunization schedules, etc.), and common conditions, IMGs can identify gaps between their previous training and UK expectations. The guideline-aligned answers help clarify what the standard of care is in the UK context. Additionally, IMGs preparing for licensing exams (such as PLAB, or postgraduate exams like MRCP) will find a wealth of practice material. Using iatroX’s question bank MRCP section, for example, an IMG can simulate the style and difficulty of the exam while getting immediate tutoring from the AI on any weak areas. Since iatroX is free, it lowers the barrier for IMGs who may already be facing financial and logistical hurdles relocating to a new country. It essentially offers them a free medical question bank to rapidly get up to speed with local medical knowledge.

For UK Clinicians and Trainees: Lifelong learning is a cornerstone of good medical practice, and this includes preparation for postgraduate qualifications and continuous professional development. Junior doctors in the UK often prepare for postgraduate exams like MRCP, MRCS, MRCGP, etc., alongside busy clinical jobs. iatroX provides a convenient way to integrate study into their schedule – they can answer a few questions during a commute or lunch break and get high-yield feedback instantly. For a GP trainee, alternating between iatroX’s question bank AKT for multiple-choice revision and its SCA cases practice for honing consultation skills could be an efficient strategy. The immediate, AI-curated feedback helps clarify doubts on the spot – functioning like a tutor or senior colleague who is available 24/7. Beyond exam prep, practicing with iatroX can help clinicians stay updated. Medicine is ever-changing, and even qualified doctors must keep abreast of new developments. Answering questions about, say, the latest antibiotic guidelines or new treatment options for diabetes, with iatroX providing the evidence, doubles as both revision and continuing education. By alleviating some of the cognitive load of finding and digesting new information, iatroX could help clinicians avoid knowledge stagnation and burnout. Indeed, providing such decision support and learning reinforcement is one way AI tools are expected to bolster clinicians, ultimately contributing to a more resilient healthcare workforce​.

Finally, because iatroX is an online platform, it contributes to a sense of community among its users. Learners can engage in discussions about certain questions or explanations (iatroX invites feedback on its content, which we will discuss later), and this collaborative learning can be especially reassuring for those studying in isolation. IMGs, for example, might not have a local study group – but through a platform like iatroX, they can connect with peers facing similar challenges, ask questions about British clinical nuances, and share learning tips. In this way, iatroX acts not just as a question bank, but as a learning community empowered by AI and collective knowledge.

AI in Medical Education: A Balanced Outlook

The incorporation of AI into medical education, as exemplified by iatroX, brings tremendous promise – but it also calls for careful consideration of limitations and ethical use. On the optimistic side, AI tools are proving their ability to enhance learning. Generative AI can tailor education to the individual, provide instant feedback, and even help create new learning content​. The vision of AI as a personalized tutor is increasingly realistic: large language models like GPT-4 have demonstrated proficiency in medical knowledge, even to the extent of passing medical licensure exams in some studies​[degruyter.com](https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/gme-2024-0021/pdf#:~:text=various examinations to assess the,fields compared to others? In). This means they can potentially teach or quiz students with a high degree of expertise. In platforms like iatroX, this expertise is harnessed not to replace human teachers, but to make expert guidance available on-demand to anyone. In a busy hospital or a remote area with few educational resources, having an AI-powered assistant that can explain an advanced clinical concept or provide practice questions is undoubtedly a boon. It aligns with the goal of efficiently tailoring medical education to each learner’s needs​, something that has been difficult to achieve at scale by traditional methods.

However, a measured, evidence-based perspective is essential when adopting these technologies. Recent reviews of AI in medical training emphasize significant risks and challenges alongside the opportunities​. One concern is accuracy: if students come to rely on AI answers, any error or hallucination could mislead their learning. iatroX’s use of RAG and citations is a direct response to this, attempting to ground answers in verifiable facts. Still, users must remain vigilant and use the provided references to cross-check information. Overreliance on AI is another pitfall highlighted by educators​. Learning with AI should be an adjunct to, not a replacement for, traditional learning through patients, textbooks, and teachers. For example, while iatroX can provide a wealth of knowledge and practice, medical students must still develop hands-on skills and critical thinking that only real clinical exposure and mentorship can foster. In fact, the JMIR Medical Education article “Embracing ChatGPT for Medical Education” cautions that maintaining a balance between AI-driven learning and human interaction is crucial so as not to hinder the development of critical thinking and communication skills. The key is to use AI as a powerful tool within a well-rounded education, much like using a stethoscope or a diagnostic app, rather than as an all-knowing oracle.

Ethical considerations also come into play. With any AI platform, issues of data privacy, consent, and transparency must be handled responsibly​. iatroX, being a question-answer platform, deals primarily with disseminating knowledge rather than patient data, which mitigates some privacy concerns. Nonetheless, the platform must ensure that the sources it uses are appropriately credited (which it does via citations) and that any user data (like performance metrics) is stored securely and used ethically. Another ethical angle is fairness and access. iatroX’s free model is a positive in this regard, helping bridge gaps for those who cannot afford expensive courses. Yet, digital access itself can be a barrier – reliable internet and devices are needed to use such platforms. As the medical education community evaluates AI tools, it’s important to strive for equitable access and support for all learners, so that AI doesn’t inadvertently widen disparities.

In summary, AI’s role in medical education is emerging and evolving. Platforms like iatroX demonstrate how to harness AI’s strengths – vast knowledge, speed, personalization – while consciously putting checks in place to address its weaknesses (like potential inaccuracy and lack of human judgment). The medical education literature encourages this balanced approach: embrace the innovation, but do so with eyes open. By engaging with AI resources critically, students and clinicians can reap the benefits (enhanced learning efficiency, better knowledge retention, reduced information overload) without falling prey to the pitfalls (misinformation, overreliance, ethical lapses). This balance will be crucial in ensuring that AI integration truly contributes to a resilient and responsive healthcare system, where technology supports human clinicians in delivering better care.

Positioning iatroX Among Medical Learning Resources

The concept of question banks is not new to medical education. For years, trainees have relied on resources like Passmedicine, Pastest, and BMJ OnExamination to practice exam-style questions and gauge their knowledge. These platforms, along with newer free resources such as Geeky Medics (known for OSCE materials and question lists) and Mind The Bleep (a repository of free clinical notes and quizzes), have set a high bar for quality content. It’s therefore reasonable to ask: Where does iatroX fit into this ecosystem?

Complementing Traditional Question Banks: Established question banks like Passmedicine and Pastest offer extensive question inventories and are curated by experts, often with detailed written explanations. iatroX enters this domain with a distinct value proposition – it provides a similar breadth of content without the cost barrier, and infuses AI into the experience for up-to-date explanations. Rather than directly competing feature-for-feature, iatroX can be seen as complementing these resources. For learners who already use a paid question bank, iatroX can serve as an additional free revision tool to reinforce learning, perhaps by covering niche topics or updated guidelines that a static bank hasn’t incorporated yet. For those who cannot afford subscriptions, iatroX aims to democratize access to high-quality practice material, ensuring that the ability to prepare for exams like MRCP or AKT is not limited by one’s budget. The presence of AI-driven content means that even if iatroX’s core question set overlaps with other banks, the angle it provides (with dynamic, source-backed explanations) is novel and useful. One might use Passmedicine to drill core facts and then use iatroX to get an explanatory deep-dive on select questions that were particularly challenging.

Building on Free Resources and Community Platforms: Free educational sites such as Geeky Medics and Mind The Bleep have proven that high-quality medical education content can be delivered at no cost, relying on community contributions and creative approaches. iatroX shares the free-access ethos and takes it into the realm of AI. For example, Geeky Medics offers free question quizzes and clinical skill guides; iatroX can build on this by providing an interactive question bank where each answer is an opportunity to learn from an AI-augmented explanation. Mind The Bleep provides concise notes and flashcards – iatroX provides interactive application of that knowledge through questions and answers. In a way, iatroX stands on the shoulders of these giants, combining the free access model with sophisticated AI technology. The platform does not disparage or seek to replace any existing resource; rather, it enriches the overall pool of resources available. If a student uses Mind The Bleep to review the management of asthma, they could then answer asthma questions on iatroX to test their retention, receiving AI feedback that might point them to the latest BTS/SIGN asthma guideline in the explanation. This harmony of resources is ultimately a win-win for learners.

Staying Current and Adaptive: One challenge for any educational resource is staying current with exam formats and medical knowledge. Traditional question banks update periodically through manual revisions. An AI-driven platform like iatroX has the potential to update continuously. Whenever guidelines change or new evidence emerges, the RAG system can incorporate that into explanations immediately. This means iatroX might be quicker to reflect, say, a new drug that became first-line for a condition, whereas a conventional bank might take months until the next edition is released. From a learner’s perspective, this adaptiveness means less worry about studying outdated material. Additionally, because iatroX can potentially generate new questions algorithmically, it could expand its question bank in response to identified needs – for instance, if users request more questions on dermatology, the AI could help draft new questions which are then reviewed for accuracy. This agility is a unique strength of an AI-powered question bank.

Limitations and the Human Touch: In positioning iatroX, it’s also honest to acknowledge its current limitations. AI-generated explanations, while often excellent, might occasionally lack the nuance or pedagogical clarity that a seasoned educator’s writing provides. There could be instances where the AI’s phrasing is less straightforward, or the depth is slightly off-target for what a student needs. iatroX’s team is actively addressing this by refining prompts and involving human experts in curation. Users of iatroX might note that some explanations feel more AI-written than others – this is part of the iterative improvement process. In contrast, a Passmedicine explanation has a consistent human tone. Recognizing this difference, iatroX encourages users to give feedback on explanations that are unclear or inaccurate. This feedback loop will help the platform improve rapidly. It’s refreshing that an AI-focused platform invites this dialogue; it shows a commitment to continuous improvement and collaboration with the clinical community.

Conclusion: A Collaborative Future for AI in Medical Training

The introduction of Quiz iatroX into the landscape of medical education exemplifies a forward-thinking yet pragmatic approach to leveraging AI for learning. We have seen how iatroX’s large, free question bank – enriched by retrieval augmented generation and thoughtful prompt engineering – provides a novel way for medical students, IMGs, and clinicians to engage with medical knowledge. By delivering guideline-aligned, evidence-supported answers, the platform helps users not only test themselves but also learn in a more meaningful, evidence-based way. This approach can lighten the cognitive load on learners, allowing them to focus on understanding rather than on searching for information. In an era when biomedical knowledge is growing exponentially, such tools can be invaluable in training clinicians who are well-prepared and adaptable.

However, the true success of iatroX and similar innovations will be measured by how they are received and utilized by the medical community. As we integrate AI into education, feedback and dialogue become more important than ever. We invite medical students, educators, junior doctors, and other clinicians to engage with iatroX, try out its features, and share their experiences. What works well? What could be improved? Are the explanations hitting the mark in terms of clinical accuracy and helpfulness? User feedback will guide the refinement of the platform’s AI models and content. Moreover, open dialogue can address concerns and build trust. For instance, discussing a particularly surprising AI-generated answer on a forum could lead to clarifications that benefit all users. The creators of iatroX appear eager to collaborate with the community – an essential stance, because successful educational AI should be co-created with input from those it serves.

In looking ahead, one can envision iatroX expanding its capabilities or inspiring similar tools in other regions and specialties. The principle of providing free, AI-enhanced educational support is broadly applicable, whether it’s for surgical trainees, nurses, or continuing professional development in any healthcare field. As these tools proliferate, they hold the potential to make medical education more inclusive, efficient, and responsive. Importantly, by helping learners manage information overload and keeping their knowledge up-to-date, resources like iatroX contribute to a healthcare workforce that is resilient in the face of rapid change – a quality that ultimately translates to better patient care.

In summary, AI in medical education is not a distant future concept; it is here, in platforms like iatroX, taking practical steps to improve how we learn and teach medicine. By blending time-tested methods (like question practice) with modern AI techniques, iatroX offers a glimpse of how we can uphold the highest standards of medical knowledge while adapting to the evolving demands on clinicians. We encourage you to explore iatroX, reflect on its approach, and join the conversation about how AI can best support medical education. Through collective effort and open-minded experimentation, we can ensure that these technologies are harnessed in a way that truly empowers learners and, by extension, the healthcare systems they will go on to strengthen.

References:

  1. Huang K, et al. Reducing Hallucinations in Large Language Models using Retrieval-Augmentation. 2023. (Referenced in [arxiv.org](https://arxiv.org/html/2503.01859v1#:~:text=Our approach is a scalable,,back to authoritative medical sources) for minimizing hallucination risks).

  2. Kaczmarek JI, et al. Optimizing Retrieval-Augmented Generation of Medical Content for Spaced Repetition Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.01859, 2025​[arxiv.org](https://arxiv.org/html/2503.01859v1#:~:text=Our approach is a scalable,,back to authoritative medical sources).

  3. AMA (Marc Triola, MD). ChatGPT in medical education: Generative AI and the future of artificial intelligence in health care. AMA Update Video, Feb 23, 2024​[ama-assn.org](https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/digital-health/chatgpt-medical-education-generative-ai-and-future-artificial#:~:text=AI as a co,they make the absolute best)​[ama-assn.org](https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/digital-health/chatgpt-medical-education-generative-ai-and-future-artificial#:~:text=So I think in the,level of that individual student).

  4. Siegel MG, et al. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning May Resolve Health Care Information Overload. Arthroscopy. 2024 Jun;40(6):1721-1723​[pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38218231/#:~:text=Biomedical information doubles almost every,The technology is improving)​[pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38218231/#:~:text=comes to AI including ML,,Most of).

  5. Zhang A, Zhao A, et al. Embracing ChatGPT for Medical Education: Exploring Its Impact on Doctors and Medical Students. JMIR Med Educ. 2024;10:e52483​[mededu.jmir.org](https://mededu.jmir.org/2024/1/e52483#:~:text=ChatGPT (OpenAI), a cutting,data and adhering to data)​[mededu.jmir.org](https://mededu.jmir.org/2024/1/e52483#:~:text=tutoring, and automated question,challenges, ChatGPT offers transformative opportunities).

  6. Janumpally S, et al. Generative artificial intelligence in graduate medical education: Opportunities and risks. Frontiers in Digital Health. 2025​[pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11758457/#:~:text=Generative artificial intelligence ,biases in AI outputs, and)​[pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11758457/#:~:text=the existing literature and provide,both its benefits and limitations).

  7. Qiu Y, Liu C, et al. Capable exam-taker and question-generator: the dual role of generative AI in medical education assessment. Global Medical Education, 2024​[degruyter.com](https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/gme-2024-0021/pdf#:~:text=various examinations to assess the,fields compared to others? In)​[degruyter.com](https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/gme-2024-0021/pdf#:~:text=ranging from detecting question error,,University School of Medicine, Shanghai). (De Gruyter)