How can I differentiate between acute and chronic sports injuries during a clinical examination?

Guideline-aligned answer with reasoning, red flags and references. Clinically reviewed by Dr Kola Tytler MBBS CertHE MBA MRCGP.

Posted: 17 August 2025Updated: 17 August 2025 Guideline-Aligned (High Confidence) Clinically Reviewed
Dr Kola Tytler MBBS CertHE MBA MRCGPClinical Lead • iatroX

Differentiating between acute and chronic sports injuries during a clinical examination primarily relies on the patient's history, particularly the onset and mechanism of injury, alongside specific physical findings .

Acute sports injuries typically result from a sudden, specific traumatic event, such as a fall or direct impact . The onset of symptoms is usually immediate, presenting with sudden pain, swelling, and often bruising at the injury site . Common examples include sprains and strains . During examination, there will likely be immediate tenderness, swelling, and possibly a visible deformity or bruising .

In contrast, chronic sports injuries, often referred to as overuse stress damage, develop gradually over time due to repetitive stress or microtrauma to tissues . The onset of symptoms is insidious, with pain often worsening progressively with activity and improving with rest . Wörtler and Schäffeler (2015) highlight chronic overuse stress damage, particularly in areas like the forefoot and midfoot, as distinct from acute injuries. Patients may report a history of increasing discomfort over weeks or months, without a single identifiable traumatic event . Clinical examination might reveal localized tenderness, but significant swelling or bruising is less common than in acute injuries . Pain may be reproduced with specific movements or activities that involve the affected structure, consistent with repetitive strain .

Educational content only. Always verify information and use clinical judgement.